Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Grovewood Logo
FOR ALL YOUR DOUBLE GLAZING NEEDS
0845 470 1977
Keeping you warm in the Winter and cool in the Summer
www.grovewoodonline.co.uk
 
 
Thursday, 8th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the OS-Chichester Observer site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

HOSPITAL CAMPAIGN: PCT chief: We knew about secret baby unit 'agreement'



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 17 July 2008
A TOP health boss has admitted he knew Worthing did not want to provide a high-dependency baby care unit before making the decision to upgrade it as the county's major general hospital.
Originally it was thought the PCT was in the dark over the deal struck in April between Worthing and Brighton to provide only a low-level neonatal unit at Worthing, and send tiny babies needing more specialist care to the East Sussex hospital.

But
now chief executive of the West Sussex PCT John Wilderspin has said he knew about the agreement before the meeting on June 4, when the board decided to make Worthing the MGH and downgrade the Chichester hospital, including its top-class high-dependency baby care unit.

He said the knowledge Worthing did not want to provide the higher-level unit should not have been a factor in the decision-making process because the PCT had dictated the major general hospital must provide a higher-level unit.

But he told the Observer ongoing discussions about the numbers of babies which would be cared for and confusion between consultants and staff at both hospitals was 'distracting'.

"That was not helpful," he said. "I did know about the (April) meeting before we met on June 4 but at that meeting we decided the MGH must provide a level 2a (high-dependency) service."

Abigail Rowe from the Support St Richard's campaign said she was 'absolutely disgusted' at the revelation.

"How can the public trust the PCT when they have made their decision knowing these two hospitals were proposing worse services?

"The idea of Fit For the Future was that services were supposed to be better in West Sussex, not worse."




What do you think? Click here to send a letter or leave a comment below.

Click here to go back to Chichester news
Click here to go back to Bognor Regis news
Click here to go back to Midhurst and Petworth news

To tell us where in the world you are reading this story click on the link below to add yourself to our readers' map.

MAP





The full article contains 361 words and appears in OS-Chichester Observer newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 July 2008 3:11 PM
  • Source: OS-Chichester Observer
  • Location: Chichester
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.