Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Grovewood Logo
FOR ALL YOUR DOUBLE GLAZING NEEDS
0845 470 1977
Keeping you warm in the Winter and cool in the Summer
www.grovewoodonline.co.uk
 
 
Thursday, 8th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the OS-Chichester Observer site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Pervert could live next door to you



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 14 August 2008
A paedophile is living in secret in our community after the courts decided to keep his identity a secret.
Parents have demanded to know if they are living in the same street as the sex offender who appeared before Chichester magistrates and admitted 28 charges of making nearly 700 indecent photographs of children.

"People on the sex offenders' register should be named so that parents can keep their children safe," said North Mundham mother Rebecca Zugor.

The court ruled his family's safety was more important than telling the public who he was and, after admitting the crimes, he was able to walk just as anonymously out of the court room and into the city's streets.

The court order, handed to the Observer, said the order was 'necessary' in the 'interests of justice', and because 'the defendant's children reside locally and attend the local school'.

It also points to riots on the Paulsgrove estate in Portsmouth which exploded into violence in 2000 when parents believed a child sex offender was living in their community.

The decision has sent shockwaves through the community because the man could be living anywhere.

Mother-of-five Stephanie Cannon was shocked to learn the court would not even reveal the area in which he lived.

"I think he should be named and shamed," she said. "I think it is disgraceful we are not allowed to know where he is.

"I think if you ask any parent they will say the same thing – we should be able to know. At least to be told they are in your area or where they hang about."

The court was told police officers raided the man's home on November 28 last year and seized CDs which were examined and found to contain a total of 683 images of child abuse.

Of these there were three level five photos – the most serious – 127 level four, 115 level three, 58 level two and 380 level one photos.

"It is a worry he has pleaded guilty to this and he could be living next door to me," said one mother-of-two from Westergate, who asked not to be named.

"It is frightening and disappointing that these things happen right under your nose.

"He should be named – it is not fair on anyone in the community if he isn't."

A mother of three from Donnington, who asked to remain anonymous, added: "What does worry me is that with community breakdown, these sad sick people are free to wander with no one keeping an eye on them."

The man was granted unconditional bail and has been placed on the Sex Offenders' Register.

He will be sentenced on September 8 at Chichester Crown Court.


What do you think? Click here to send a letter or leave a comment below.

Click here to go back to Chichester news
Click here to go back to Bognor Regis news
Click here to go back to Midhurst and Petworth news

To tell us where in the world you are reading this story click on the link below to add yourself to our readers' map.

MAP




The full article contains 523 words and appears in OS-Chichester Observer newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 August 2008 2:17 PM
  • Source: OS-Chichester Observer
  • Location: Chichester
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.